- November 19, 2017
Why criminal act is not the same as criminal liability
In common law, criminal liability is tested by actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind). This means that a criminal act alone does not warrant criminal liability. The prosecution is required to prove that the person committing the crime was mentally sound to realise the act was wrong. There is no global standard of a minimum age where a child can be deemed to be mature enough to recognise consequences of a crime, but most countries have a minimum age of criminal responsibility (CR) below which it is presumed a child is incapable of committing a crime and cannot be punished..
- actus reus - guilty act
- mens rea - guilty mind
- After the Nirbhaya Case, the amended Juvenile Justice Act allows juveniles above 16 yrs to be tried as adults.
- Age of Criminal responsibility in India is 7 years.
In India, the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000 that took a reformative approach towards juveniles under the age 18 was replaced by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015. The new act allows children aged 16 to 18 years to be tried as adults for heinous offences. In the US, many states allow juveniles to be tried as an adult if they have committed heinous crimes.
In 2001, 14-year-old Lionel Tate was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for murdering a 6-year-old girl in 1999. Tate was only 12 at the time of the crime and became the youngest person in the US to get such a severe sentence.